Posts Tagged ‘webinar questions’

Jan
11
2012

Read Our 2012 January Newsletter

Jan. 11 – Read our January newsletter with agency updates and notes from our last webinar. MCA.com

No Comments »
Jan
11
2012

MCA Monthly Compliance Update – January 2012

MCA Logo

MCA Monthly Compliance Update

January 2012


Our Services



Pre-Funding Reviews






Stay Updated
Connect with us:
View our profile on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Join Our Mailing List!

Welcome to the MCA Monthly Compliance Update. To help you stay compliant and up-to-date, our newsletters contain mortgage compliance tips and updates. We hope that you find the content informative and useful. As always, your feedback is appreciated.


Industry Highlights

Read our notes from our most recent free webinar series, “Looking Back & Planning Ahead”.  The new year has arrived, and it’s time to comply with old and new regulations.  Review mortgage compliance in 2011, and how we may expect to comply in 2012.


To view the webinar presentation for “Looking Back & Planning Ahead”, follow the link below:


Looking Back & Planning Ahead Presentation


Compliance Updates

Jan. 6 – Freddie Mac revises requirements announced in Bulletin 2011-22. FreddieMac.com


Jan. 3 – HUD addresses large loan risk mitigation policies. HUD.gov


Dec. 30 – Fannie and Freddie announce guaranty fee increase effective April 1, 2012. eFannieMae.com FreddieMac.com


Dec. 29 – VA announces final change to regulation for modifying VA guaranteed home loans. VA.gov


Dec. 29 – VA announces value adjustments and the requirement for interior photos of subject properties.
VA.gov


To see all the latest mortgage compliance news and updates, visit our News & Resources page.


Deadlines

January 1, 2012

Fannie Mae: Mortgage Loans Delivered to use Revised Form 2100 03/06 (rev 12/10)

In order for lenders to deliver mortgage loans secured by properties on community land trusts, they must use the appropriate Fannie Mae ground lease rider.  Fannie Mae has revised its standard community land trust ground lease rider for use with the NCLTN 2011 CLT Network Model Ground Lease and with the ICE Model Ground Lease.

The new version of Fannie Mae’s ground lease rider is labeled the Community Land Trust Ground Lease Rider, Form 2100 3/06 (rev 12/10).  Lenders may use Form 2100 3/06 (rev 12/10) with either the NCLTN 2011 CLT Network Model Ground Lease or the ICE Model Ground Lease. Lenders should be certain that their community land trust partners have approved the use of the 12/10 version of Form 2100 before the 3/06 version is retired 12/31/2011. Loans delivered after 12/31/2011 must use the 12/10 version of Form 2100.


For details on this subject matter, please follow the link eFannieMae.com


March 19, 2012

Freddie Mac: Mortgages Delivered On Or After 3/19/12 To Be In MISMO v3.0 Format

For all mortgages delivered to Freddie Mac on or after March 19, 2012, data must be delivered in the MISMO v3.0 format; and if the mortgage application date is on or after December 1, 2011, the delivery must include the required ULDD data points. More details at FreddieMac.com


March 19, 2012

Freddie Mac: Requiring Appraisal Color Photographs

Effective for conventional mortgages that require appraisal reports and have delivery dates on or after 3/19/12, Freddie Mac is requiring all appraisal photographs to be in color and eliminating acceptability of facsimile copies of appraisal reports. Read at FreddieMac.com


March 19, 2012

Freddie Mac: Retiring MIDANET

Freddie Mac is retiring MIDANET for delivery and removing references to it from the Guide. Visit FreddieMac.com for more information.


Events

February 5-8, 2012

MBA’s CREF/Multifamily Housing Convention & Expo

Atlanta, GA
For more information, visit mbaa.org


February 21-24, 2012
MBA’s National Mortgage Servicing Conference & Expo
Orlando, FL
To learn more, visit mbaa.org


Get important compliance updates right away! Follow and Friend us on Twitter and Facebook.

No Comments »
May
12
2011

Answers to Compliance Questions from Webinar “Evaluating Your Appraisal”

We want to thank everyone who attended our webinar “Evaluating Your Appraisal.” We had many excellent questions during the webinar, and we were able to answer several on air. For multiple questions that weren’t answered during the webinar, you can find the answers below. You can also download the slides below.



Our experts look forward to serving all your mortgage compliance needs. Call 877-250-5243 or email info@mortgagecomplianceadvisors.com.


Have more questions? Submit a question or comment in the comment box at the bottom.

You can also sign up to receive invitations to our webinars and monthly compliance updates.


Question 1 – Is it true that if we determine that an appraisal is unacceptable, our only choice is to order a second appraisal?

  • Answer – You are allowed to contact the appraiser and ask them to correct any errors with the appraisal. Please review FNMA FAQ regarding who may contact the appraiser with questions.



Question 2 – If the appraiser uses poor comps and has red flags, we are stuck with the appraisal and can only complain to the AMC. Any thoughts?

  • Answer – Section II of AIR states: If there is a reasonable basis to believe that the initial appraisal was flawed or tainted and such basis is clearly and appropriately noted in the Mortgage file, then a secondary appraisal may be ordered. However, the burden lies with you proving the first appraisal was flawed.



Question 3 – Is it required to have a copy of legal description attached as an addendum?

  • Answer – Legal description is required to be on the top portion of the appraisal. Legal description attached as an addendum appears to be ok.



Question 4 – Can ANYONE ask an appraiser why certain comps were not used in their report?

  • Answer – If your intent is to influence the value then this not allowed. Please review FNMA FAQ regarding who may contact the appraiser with questions.



Question 5 – When is it necessary to perform the income and/or cost approach to value?

  • Answer – Income is only necessary on investment properties. Cost approach is only required on manufactured homes and when requested.



Mortgage Compliance Advisors offers a free webinar every month. Visit www.MortgageComplianceAdvisors.com to register for next month’s webinar or to learn more about how MCA can serve all your compliance needs.


(Mortgage Compliance Advisors, LLC (MCA) makes reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the answers. MCA makes no express or implied warranty of any kind respecting the information presented and assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. This online chat is not legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for proper professional or legal advice.)

No Comments »
Feb
23
2011

Answers to Questions from Our Webinar “Essentials of a Compliant QC Plan”

We want to thank everyone who attended our webinar “Essentials of a Compliant QC Plan.” As promised, below you will find answers to the questions asked during the webinar. You can also download the slides below.



Our experts look forward to serving all your compliance needs. Call 877-250-5243 or email info@mortgagecomplianceadvisors.com.


Have more questions? Submit a question or comment in the comment box at the bottom.
You can also sign up to receive invitations to our webinars and monthly compliance updates.


Question 1 – How do you go about verifying assets?

  • Answer – You would attempt to get the company to verify the information you have in your file is correct, via new VOD or phone conversation. You will want to assure that the asset documentation has not been forged or altered in any way.




Question 2 – We are a broker and most of our lenders will require a quarterly audit of our FHA loans.  You mentioned the detailed QC Plan reviews are trickling downhill.  Do you foresee lenders requiring their approved brokers to do more than the 10% of FHA loans being audited?  The FHA loans are all we’re auditing at this time.  Do we need to include all of our other loan types?

  • Answer – I do not anticipate any lenders requiring more than the FHA required 10% selection. We are certainly seeing a bigger focus on Quality Control from all lenders and agencies.  You are only required to audit files if your investors or licensing agencies require it.  However, I would recommend you QC at least 10% of all your loans. This will give you a good baseline of the quality and risk level of all the loans you originate.



Question 3 - What is acceptable to meet occupancy certification requirements?

  • Answer – There is not guidance on this topic. However, if audited, you will need to justify that a satisfactory attempt to verify occupancy was conducted.



Question 4 – Are these reviews [discretionary reviews] required if you’re a broker and not the lender?

  • Answer – If you are a broker, then you are only required to conduct QC reviews if your investors or licensing authorities require you to do so. If those entities do not require discretionary reviews, then you are not required to perform them. However, it’s good business practice to know the quality of the product you are selling.



Question 5 – Adverse Action Reviews. Can they be done in house, with processing staff the same as the prefunding reviews, or do they need to be done using the same process as QC of closed files, in our case, outsourced?

  • Answer – I am not aware of any rules stating Adverse Action reviews must be done independently. However, I have also not read where they are allowed to be outside of the independent QC department.  This will need to be a company decision.



Question 6 – If we use a 3rd party servicer, who performs the audits?

  • Answer – The 3rd party typically performs the audits.



Question 7 - To be in compliance with ECOA (Reg B) if we have pulled credit on a file as a pre-qual example TBD – are we still required to send a notice of action if we are unable to approve this loan due to excessive ratios or something along those lines, we would have pulled credit. These files would be either TBD loans or incomplete applications. These loans would not be subject to HMDA correct if they are a TBD property.

  • Answer – ECOA’s definition of application is much more broad and vague than the RESPA definition of application. I would recommend in this example to meet your ECOA regulations–you either issue an approval or adverse action (denial) within 30 days. If your TBD meets the definition of Pre-Approval, you are required to report this transaction to HMDA.



Question 8 - Since your presentation is focused for the large lenders where agencies are performing audits–perhaps you can comment on the differences on QC level for the smaller brokers, ie is just having a company like MCA auditing our loan files enough?

  • Answer – QC is about risk management, so I would I would suggest you complete as many of the steps as possible that I mentioned in the presentation. Obviously, you will not be reviewing as many details as the lender would. If you are outsourcing, your QC your vendor should be auditing your files according to your business type. When MCA audits a file, they only hold the broker accountable for items they have control over.



Question 9 – Will you please repeat the calculation for the defect rate?

  • Answer – Fannie Mae defines Defect Rate as: The number of loans, expressed as a percentage, reflecting the total loans with defects discovered in the loan review process divided by the total loans reviewed.



Question 10 - It was mentioned that these webinars are available monthly. What do we need to do to be able to join every month?



Mortgage Compliance Advisors offers a free webinar every month. Visit www.MortgageComplianceAdvisors.com to register for next month’s webinar or to learn more about how MCA can serve all your compliance needs.

(MCA makes reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the answers. MCA makes no express or implied warranty of any kind respecting the information presented and assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. This Q&A is not legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for proper professional or legal advice.)

No Comments »
Feb
03
2011

MCA Monthly Compliance Update – February 2011


MCA Logo

Leaf picture

MCA Monthly Compliance Update

February 2011

In This Issue
Fed Won’t Finalize 3 Reg Z Changes
Webinar Q & A
HUD/FHA Update
Fannie Mae Update
Freddie Mac Update
VA Update
Our Services
Stay Updated
Connect with us:
View our profile on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Join Our Mailing List!
Welcome to the MCA Monthly Compliance Update. To help you stay compliant and up-to-date, our newsletters contain compliance tips and updates. We hope that you find the content informative and useful. As always, your feedback is appreciated.



Clients now have another option to tranfer files quickly and efficiently into our quality control review system.

To get started with sending us files through the BlitzDocs system, call 877-226-3216 or reply to this email.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -


Join our free monthly webinar “Essentials of a Compliant QC Plan.”

Feb 2011 webinar


Learn QC Plan essentials to comply with agency/investor requirements.


Join our free webinar on Thursday, Feb 17 at 12:00 p.m. MST.



Reserve your webinar seat now at:


Register Now

https://www1.gotomeeting.com/register/355578520


Implementing a good quality control plan can help you improve operations and manage risk. Join us for a FREE webinar on February 17, where we will review the essentials of a compliant QC plan. This will include how to comply with investor requirements as well as agency guidelines from FHA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. We will cover such topics as disclosure compliance, pre-funding reviews, post-closing reviews, branch reviews, record retention, and trend tracking. We encourage you to submit questions for our panelists when registering and also during the Q&A session at the end of the webinar.


(*You will receive a link to the SLIDES in a reminder email sent ONE HOUR before the webinar starts.)


- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -


For real time compliance news, you can now follow us on

Twitter and Facebook.

Fed Won’t Finalize 3 Reg Z Changes

Federal Reserve does not plan to proceed with finalizing three pending mortgage rulemakings under Regulation Z


- On February 1, the Federal Reserve announced that “it does not expect to finalize three pending rulemakings under Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), prior to the transfer of authority for such rulemakings to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)” …  Press release on FederalReserve.gov


Webinar Questions & Answers

Common Findings Webinar Q&A


We want to thank everyone who attended our webinar: “Common Compliance Findings of 2010 & How to Prevent Them.” As promised, we have posted the slides and answers to the questions asked.


We have included the first three questions below. *Please visit our website to read all 40 questions and answers.


  • Question 1 – What kind of documents are reviewed for proof of UW signature?
    • Answer – Loan Approval, Transmittal Summary, FHA Transmittal Summary, FHA Conditional Commitment, FHA DE Approval, VA Loan Analysis, etc
  • Question 2 – What is the Tabular TIL?
    • Answer – TILA, specifically MDIA, states the following:  “The September 2010 interim rule requires creditors who extend consumer credit secured by real property or a dwelling to disclose summary information about interest rates and payment changes in a tabular format.” This will be enforced on all applications taken after January 30.  For more information, please visit FederalReserve.gov.
  • Question 3 – What are the penalties or ramifications for not disclosing correctly or timely?
    • Answer – The penalty for violating RESPA is up to $10,000 and/or 1 year in prison for each violation. The penalty for violating TILA is $5,000 and/or 1 year in prison for each occurrence. This is in addition to any restitution paid to borrowers. …Read the rest of the questions and answers on our website.
HUD/FHA Update

ML 2011-03: Extension of Temporary Guidance for Condominium Policy


- Announces extension of temporary condo policy guidance issued in ML 2009-46 A. Entire letter on HUD.gov


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -


ML 2011-04: FHA Capture of Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System and Registry (NMLS) Information


- Announces that HUD will begin collecting NMLS information from entities that originate FHA loans. Entire letter on HUD.gov


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Announces changes to the annual audited financial statement reporting requirements for lenders in parent-subsidiary structures
- Announces new requirements for reporting loan fees for participants in FHA Multifamily Programs


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Provides guidance on claim process for FHA refinances of borrowers in negative equity positions. Entire letter on HUD.gov


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Eliminates Master Appraisal Report (MAR) and retires several forms. Entire letter on HUD.gov


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Announces that FHA Single Family Claim remittances must be done through pay.gov. Effective 4/14/11. Entire letter on HUD.gov


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



To view all HUD Mortgagee Letters for the year, visit HUD’s website.

Fannie Mae Update


- Provides further guidance on servicer responsibilities in connection with the HHF Unemployment and Reinstatement Programs.
- Clarifies modification eligibility of unemployed borrower who becomes re-employed.


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Increases maximum allowable foreclosure attorney fee for properties in Maryland.  Announcement on eFannieMae.com


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -


- Updates Selling Guide to include changes to:

  • Community land trusts
  • Non-standard payment collection options
  • Misc. updates


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -


To view all Fannie Mae Announcements and Letters for the year, visit



Freddie Mac Update


- Introduces Freddie Mac Service Loans application (to replace MIDANET)

- Incorporates requirements for Reimbursement System into Guide

- Updates other Servicing requirements


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -




- Revises certain credit underwriting and mortgage eligibility requirements

  • Requiring verification of funds
  • Eliminating Freddie Mac-owned streamlined refinance mortgages
  • Requiring that a purchase money mortgage be seasoned for 120 days in order to be refinanced as “no cash-out”


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -


To view Recent Freddie Mac Bulletins/Industry Letters, visit Freddie Mac’s website.


VA Update


- Provides authority and instructions for servicers to pay relocation assistance to borrowers participating in two different loss mitigation options:

  • Deed-in-lieu of foreclosure (DIL)
  • Short sale with VA compromise claim

Entire circular on VA.gov


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -




- Provides short reminder to servicers of several key provisions of Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA)…  Entire circular on VA.gov


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -


To view VA Circular/News for 2010, visit the VA website.

Feel free to call us with any questions at 877-226-3216 or reply to this email.

No Comments »
Jan
26
2011

Q&A from our Webinar “Common Compliance Findings of 2010 & How to Prevent Them”

We want to thank everyone who attended our webinar “Common Compliance Findings of 2010 & How to Prevent Them.” As promised, below you will find answers to the questions asked during the webinar. You can also download the slides below.



Our experts look forward to serving all your compliance needs. Call 877-250-5243 or email info@mortgagecomplianceadvisors.com.


Have more questions? Submit a question or comment in the comment box at the bottom.


You can also sign up to receive invitations to our webinars and monthly compliance updates.


Question 1 – What kind of documents are reviewed for proof of UW signature?

  • Answer – Loan Approval, Transmittal Summary, FHA Transmittal Summary, FHA Conditional Commitment, FHA DE Approval, VA Loan Analysis, etc.




Question 2 – What is the Tabular TIL?

  • Answer – TILA, specifically MDIA, states the following:  “The September 2010 interim rule requires creditors who extend consumer credit secured by real property or a dwelling to disclose summary information about interest rates and payment changes in a tabular format.” This will be enforced on all applications taken after January 30.  For more information, please visit http://www.federalreserve.gov/reportforms/formsreview/RegZ_20100924_ffr.pdf.



Question 3 - What are the penalties or ramifications for not disclosing correctly or timely?

  • Answer – The penalty for violating RESPA is up to $10,000 and/or 1 year in prison for each violation. The penalty for violating TILA is $5,000 and/or 1 year in prison for each occurrence. This is in addition to any restitution paid to borrowers.



Question 4 – Can GFE be given to one of two applicants at the time of application and funds collected at that time for appraisal?

  • Answer – No, this is would be a violation of RESPA and TILA, as both do not allow for certain fees (including appraisal fees) to be collected at time of application. Also, the GFE must be provided to all borrowers on the application.



Question 5 – When you indicate 7 days from initial TIL to closing, is the day of the TIL day zero, then 7 business days, and then closing can occur after the 7th day?

  • Answer – The 7 day waiting period begins the day you send the TIL to the borrower. Closing can occur after the 7th day.



Question 6 – If the borrower dates the disclosures the same day as they were disclosed, would you still need proof of when and how you sent the disclosures?

  • Answer – If the application is taken in person and the borrower signs the application and signs/initials the disclosures with a date, this is acceptable evidence of disclosure.



Question 7 - Does the date you pull a credit report count as an item to determine if you’ve taken an application?

  • Answer – No. A credit report is not one of the 6 pieces of information that RESPA has defined as an application.



Question 8 - Please provide commentary on important date #2: What is the date for subsequent reissues?

  • Answer – You are not required to offer the settlement costs for longer than the original 10 business days.



Question 9 – Can you comment on delivering redisclosures via e-disclosure…do we follow the delivered timeline outline for “mailed” or can we consider received when they receive the e-disclosure?

  • Answer – You will need to follow the US mail timeframe unless you have evidence that the borrowers have received the disclosures.



Question 10 - What kind of evidence is acceptable to retain in file that initial disclosures were provided within 3 days?



Question 11 – Is a Decline a changed circumstance?

  • Answer - A decline is not a changed circumstance. A decline is an Adverse Action, and a notice must be given to the borrower with reasons for the denial within 30 days of application.



Question 12 – Do any regulators (FDIC, etc.) post common audit findings online?

  • Answer – I don’t believe so, but they are government agencies and therefore subject to the Freedom of Information Act.



Question 13 – If a mistake is made on page 1 of the GFE, can or should it be corrected without a changed circumstance, or should you just leave it and risk the violation?

  • Answer – It can only be corrected if there is an acceptable changed circumstance. RESPA does not allow for change to be made as a result of a typo or mistake. We highly recommend you review your GFE prior to disclosure.



Question 14 – Should box 1 be the expiration date, or are they asking the date of the GFE?

  • Answer – If you are referring to box 1 in the important dates section, this is how long you are going to make the rate offered on the GFE good for. There is no rule as to the time you must give, other than that a date must be given.



Question 15 – Where is the best place to go to get the detailed information on LQI?



Question 16 – We need to pull LDP & GSA on FNMA files?

  • Answer – Yes. It is now a FNMA regulation that is part of LQI and is required on applications taken after 6-30-10.



Question 17 – We have to re-disclose the TIL if the APR “decreases” by 0.125%?

  • Answer – Yes. Here is the excerpt from TILA 226.22:

(2)  the annual percentage rate shall be considered accurate if it is not more than 1/8 of 1 percentage point above or below the annual percentage rate determined in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section.

(3) In an irregular transaction, the annual percentage rate shall be considered accurate if it is not more than ¼ of 1 percentage point above or below the annual percentage rate determined in accordance with paragraph (a)(1) of this section.46


Question 18 - Re: the Final GFE matching the Final HUD, how do we “force” Escrow to not change the Final fees after closing?

  • Answer – I would recommend reviewing all the HUDs prior to closing and ensure they have been completed correctly.



Question 19 - Where can we get the Special Information Booklet?



Question 20 - Does the letter stating that the disclosures were sent need to be signed by the borrower? Or can we just do a certification?

  • Answer – No, the letter does not need to be signed by the borrower. You will just need to retain documentation of when and what documents were sent.



Question 21 – Providing disclosures within 3 days is a hot topic. We have online customers that submit online and “view” the disclosures during this process. Is the submittal printout in the file showing the disclosures viewed, proof that the disclosures were provided?

  • Answer – If you can show proof that the borrowers viewed the disclosures and you retain this documentation in your file, it should be acceptable. Please review the e-disclosure rules to assure you are in compliance.



Question 22 – We have a few lenders that will not provide copies of the underwriting package signed by the underwriter.  How do we handle this if we cannot get these items from the lender?

  • Answer – I would recommend you note in your file that you requested these documents from the lender and your request was denied.



Question 23 – You said RESPA/TILA adopted the 6 pieces of information as a Loan Application. Would that also apply to the ARM Booklet due 3 days after “application”?

  • Answer – This is correct. If you take an application for an ARM loan, you will need to provide the CHARM booklet to the borrower within 3 days of receiving all 6 pieces of information.



Question 24 – Are we required to input the SRP that we are receiving for the rate on the GFE, regardless of whether we are bank/broker, correspondent etc….?

  • Answer – SRP is not required to be disclosed on the GFE.



Question 25 – Some end investors will not purchase the loans if the disclosures and re-disclosures are incorrect or not provided within the proper timelines. Same with the APR decreasing by more than .125%. Some end investors will not purchase the loans, so I would recommend checking with your intended investor.

  • Answer – We always recommend ongoing conversations with your investors as to what their requirements and polices are.




Question 26 – Shouldn’t line 1 of the important dates be the actual lock date if the loan is locked?

  • Answer – If your rate is locked, line 1 in the important dates section should be the day the rate lock expires.



Question 27- Is the late fee for VA 5% or 4%?

  • Answer – The late fee for a VA loan is 4%.



Question 28 – Refinance loans must be disclosed within 3 days of receiving the 6 pieces of information, correct?  You cannot choose not to ask for income or withhold disclosures for the documentation to support what the borrower has stated or provided, correct?

  • Answer - I agree on both accounts.



Question 29 – On the GFE, can the credit amount change if you are a broker?  One of my lenders told me that could never change. My understanding was it could as long as you were below the original total origination fee.

  • Answer – It is our understanding that fees to the borrower can decrease (or credit increases) without penalty.



Question 30 – If you have an interview date on the 1003 of the 3rd, but you don’t have the 6 items to make it an official application but you get a contract on the 10th, can the interview date be the 3rd and all the rest of the RESPAs be dated the 10th?

  • Answer – Yes, this is acceptable. However, your application date will be the 10th, as this is when you received all 6 pieces to complete the application.



Question 31 – By date stamp, do you just mean having a date on the cover letter?

  • Answer – Yes. Or a date stamp on each disclosure provided to the borrower.



Question 32 – Must an authorization to release information be signed prior to pulling credit, or can it be done later?  My understanding was they can give you a verbal authorization.

  • Answer – You are allowed to receive verbal authorization to pull credit. However, we recommend you document in your file when the verbal authorization was given. Only having a borrower authorization in the file signed after the credit was pulled is not acceptable.



Question 33 – Are fees/costs included in the Rehab Escrow Account on 203K deals disclosed on the GFE?

  • Answer – Yes, these would need to be disclosed on the GFE as they are costs associated with obtaining the loan.



Question 34 – Are they going to put the GFE and TIL on one form or just make it one set of rules/timing?

  • Answer – They are going to combine both forms into one single form. There have already been some working drafts of the form released.



Question 35 – How can you prove when you received all 6 items needed for the application?

  • Answer –When there is evidence in the file.



Question 36 – Could you explain briefly what a change of circumstance is defined as?

  • Answer – The following describes RESPA’s definition: Changed circumstance  is now defined in § 3500.2 as: (1) Acts of God, war, disaster, or other emergency; (2) Information particular to the borrower or transaction that was relied on in providing the GFE and that changes or is found to be inaccurate after the GFE has been provided, which information may include information about the credit quality of the borrower, the amount of the loan, the estimated value of the property, or any other information that was used in providing the GFE; (3) New information particular to the borrower or transaction that was not relied on in providing the GFE; or (4) Other circumstances that are particular to the borrower or transaction, including boundary disputes, the need for flood insurance, or environmental problems.



Question 37 – I know what LDP is, but what is GSA?

  • Answer – The GSA is the General Services List, also known as the Excluded Party List.



Question 38 – Earlier in the conference you said there were some exceptions to the 3 day waiting period after a TIL is disclosed.  Can you clarify that?

  • Answer – TILA does offer an exception to the 3 day waiting period.  It states if the borrower has a bona fide personal emergency, they can waive the waiting periods. However, I would not recommend using this exception, and most investors will not allow this either.




Question 39 – The error rates re: final HUD-1 does not match the most recent GFE …Do your findings only include those fee discrepancies that exceed tolerance levels, or are you including all discrepancies in this trending analysis?

  • Answer – We would issue findings for both a tolerance violation as well as the final HUD-1 not matching the most recently issued GFE. Both would be included in the trending analysis.



Question 40 – What is the best source for testing—Is it Volume Percentage or Statistical Samples?

  • Answer – We recommend using the volume percentage sampling.



Mortgage Compliance Advisors offers a free webinar every month. Visit www.MortgageComplianceAdvisors.com to register for next month’s webinar or to learn more about how MCA can serve all your compliance needs.

(Mortgage Compliance Advisors, LLC (MCA) makes reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the answers. MCA makes no express or implied warranty of any kind respecting the information presented and assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. This online chat is not legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for proper professional or legal advice.)

2 Comments »
Nov
04
2010

MCA Monthly Compliance Update – November 2010

MCA Logo

Picture of autumn leaves

MCA Monthly Update

November 2010

In This Issue
Webinar Q & A
HUD/FHA Update
Fannie Mae Update
Freddie Mac Update
VA Update
Our Services

Lending Manuals

Stay Updated
Connect with us:


View our profile on LinkedIn Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Join Our Mailing List!
Welcome to the MCA Monthly Compliance Update. To help you stay compliant and up-to-date, our newsletters contain compliance tips and updates. We hope that you find the content informative and useful. As always, your feedback is appreciated.


Join our free monthly webinar “Reviewing Red Flags of Fraud.”


We have posted the slides from last month’s webinar on our website. You can find slides from every webinar on our website under the News & Resources tab.


Webinar

Review common mortgage fraud issues and the FTC’s Red Flags Rule enforced 12/31/10.


Join our free webinar on Thursday, November 18 at 12:00 p.m. MST.



Reserve your webinar seat now at:


Register Now




The December 31st enforcement date is fast approaching for the Federal Trade Commission’s Red Flags Rule. Join us for a free webinar on November 18, where we will have a review of common mortgage fraud issues, as well as valuable information and a Q&A session about the FTC’s Red Flags Rule. (It should be noted that the extension of the enforcement deadline to December 31, 2010 does not affect other federal agencies’ enforcement of the original November 1, 2008 deadline.) We hosted a webinar in May about the red flags of fraud, and this month’s webinar will update the information and discuss any new developments.



This free webinar is open to everyone, and we encourage you to submit your questions during registration or to info@mortgagecomplianceadvisors.com.

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

For real time compliance news, you can now follow us on


Webinar Questions and Answers


We want to thank everyone who attended our webinar: “Managing the Year of Change.” As promised, we have posted the slides and answers to the questions asked.



We have included the first three questions below. *Please visit our website to read all 7 questions and answers.


Question 1 – You have stated that MDIA defines an application the same way as a GFE. So, you are saying that if we do not disclose a GFE because we do not have all of the pieces, then we do not have to issue the TIL either?

  • Answer – Yes. This is correct. TILA/MDIA shares RESPA’s definition of an application. If you do not have what is defined as an application then you are not required to disclose a TIL statement. This can be found in 12 CFR 226.19 for the Truth in Lending Act.


Question 2 - The Dodd 1 yr GFE and TIL combined implemented from what effective date?

  • Answer – The effective date is 1 year after transfer. That would be July 22, 2011. However, there is already a working copy going around, and I would expect it to be implemented well before this date.


Question 3 – I had a question related to the LO compensation that we discussed in webinar today. Changing LO compensation is a fairly easy regulation to comply with. It requires a change to the existing mind set, but logistically, it is not difficult. The requirement is to pay the LO based on total volume as a percentage or flat fee per until or some other method that doesn’t result in steering the borrower to an undesirable product.


Ok, so I’m with the regulators so far. Then, here is where I get lost. The regulation also says that companies that broker loans are also subject to the regulations. Ok, so now a brokerage firm or even a lender when acting as a broker also can not be paid differently for different pricing tiers or loan programs? So, effectively investors have to stop by brokerage firms how they are currently paying them. It is not simply paying the loan officer appropriately, but you also have to change the way you pay the firm. The interesting part is that secondary market transactions are exempt, so investors can still pay lenders but not brokers in spread premiums that change with loan program. So, it appears that the regulation much like RESPA is trying to put brokers at a competitive disadvantage. Am I understanding this correctly?

  • Answer – Yes, according to the rule, an originator is a loan originator and a broker company. Therefore, a broker company cannot be compensated based on the terms of the loan.

HUD/FHA Update

ML 2010-35: Borrower Certification for FHA Refinance of Borrowers in Negative Equity Positions


- Announces that mortgagees must obtain signed certification form from borrower if underwater borrower is refinancing. View the entire letter


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Eliminates requirements that sum of all liens not exceed geographical max mortgage limit for both purchase and refinance transactions. View the entire letter


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

To view all HUD Mortgagee Letters for the year, visit HUD’s website.


Fannie Mae Update

*To view an announcement, visit https://www.efanniemae.com/sf/guides/index.jsp.
Click “2010” on the right, under “Announcements and Lender Letters.” You will then have access to all 2010 announcements.


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Announces Appraiser Independence Requirements, which replace HVCC. Effective immediately.  Announcement on eFannieMae.com


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Announces misc. servicing policy changes, including:

  • Retirement of Payment Reduction Plan
  • Clarification of mandatory pre-filing mediation policy for mortgage loans in Florida
  • Waiver of escrow deposit accounts
  • Flood insurance requirements
  • Submissions of underwriting and servicing review files


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Provides guidance to servicers for interactions with Hardest Hit Fund Unemployment and Reinstatement Programs.  Announcement on eFannieMae.com


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -


To view all Fannie Mae Announcements and Letters for the year, visit


Freddie Mac Update

*To view an announcement, visit http://www.freddiemac.com/sell/guide/. The bulletins and industry letters are on the right.


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Announces Appraiser Independence Requirements, which replace HVCC
- Makes changes to requirements regarding:

  • Property eligibility
  • Credit
  • Eligibility requirements for Freddie Mac counterparties
  • Operational
  • Mortgage insurance


Bulletin on FreddieMac.com


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



- Announces that Freddie Mac will accept insurance from State Farm Florida Insurance Company…  Bulletin on FreddieMac.com


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



Provides guidance to servicers for interactions with Hardest Hit Fund Unemployment and Reinstatement Programs. Bulletin on FreddieMac.com


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -



-  Announces that servicers may not refer any new Freddie Mac foreclosure or bankruptcy cases to Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A. in Florida. Bulletin on FreddieMac.com


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -


To view Recent Freddie Mac Bulletins/Industry Letters, visit Freddie Mac’s website.

VA Update


- Announces enactment of Veterans’ Benefits Act of 2010

  • Changes to funding fee exemption status
  • Creation of Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) assistive technology grant program


- – - – - – - – - - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

To view VA Circular/News for 2010, visit the VA website.


Feel free to call us with any questions at 877-226-3216 or reply to this email.

1 Comment »
Oct
28
2010

Answers to Questions from our Webinar “Managing the Year of Change”

We want to thank everyone who attended our webinar “Managing the Year of Change.” As promised, below you will find answers to the questions asked during the webinar. You can also download the slides below.

Our experts look forward to serving all your compliance needs. Call 877-250-5243 or email info@mortgagecomplianceadvisors.com.

QC Audits | QC Plans | Training & Consulting | TPO Management | Agency Approval | Red Flag Policies | Tax Transcripts & Social Security Verifications


Question 1 – You have stated that MDIA defines an application the same way as a GFE. So, you are saying that if we do not disclose a GFE because we do not have all of the pieces, then we do not have to issue the TIL either?

  • Answer – Yes. This is correct. TILA/MDIA shares RESPA’s definition of an application. If you do not have what is defined as an application then you are not required to disclose a TIL statement. This can be found in 12 CFR 226.19 for the Truth in Lending Act.



Question 2 – The Dodd 1 yr GFE and TIL combined implemented from what effective date?

  • Answer – The effective date is 1 year after transfer. That would be July 22, 2011. However, there is already a working copy going around, and I would expect it to be implemented well before this date.



Question 3 – I had a question related to the LO compensation that we discussed in webinar today. Changing LO compensation is a fairly easy regulation to comply with. It requires a change to the existing mind set, but logistically, it is not difficult. The requirement is to pay the LO based on total volume as a percentage or flat fee per until or some other method that doesn’t result in steering the borrower to an undesirable product.

Ok, so I’m with the regulators so far. Then, here is where I get lost. The regulation also says that companies that broker loans are also subject to the regulations. Ok, so now a brokerage firm or even a lender when acting as a broker also can not be paid differently for different pricing tiers or loan programs? So, effectively investors have to stop by brokerage firms how they are currently paying them. It is not simply paying the loan officer appropriately, but you also have to change the way you pay the firm. The interesting part is that secondary market transactions are exempt, so investors can still pay lenders but not brokers in spread premiums that change with loan program. So, it appears that the regulation much like RESPA is trying to put brokers at a competitive disadvantage. Am I understanding this correctly?

  • Answer – Yes, according to the rule, an originator is a loan originator and a broker company. Therefore, a broker company cannot be compensated based on the terms of the loan.



Question 4 – What is GSA and LDP?

  • Answer – GSA and LDP are lists compiled by the government that include individuals and companies that have violated certain rules, laws, or who have defaulted on an obligation. If a borrower or company is on either of these lists, then they would be excluded from receiving a loan in certain circumstances.



Question 5 – For an FHA loan, how do we handle where purchasing spouse is legal US resident with valid SS#, but non purchasing spouse is illegal with only an ITIN?

  • Answer – FHA does not allow a borrower with an ITIN. You will need to search out a different solution for this or not use the non-purchasing spouse in the approval.



Question 6 – It appears under the new LO compensation rules that take effect 04.01.2010 apply to mortgage broker companies and retail lender companies when their broker loans and not just to how the LO is paid.  Of course, secondary market exception applies to non-brokered rules but it appears that companies not just LO compensation cannot be paid differently based on the loan program. Therefore, it appears to make YSP or market price now illegal even if the LO is paid consistent with the rule.  So, investors are going to have to change the way they pay the broker companies as well is my understanding.

  • Answer – Yes, according to the rule, an originator is a loan originator and a broker company. Therefore, a broker company cannot be compensated based on the terms of the loan.



Question 7 – Can you say again where the handouts from the slideshow are on your website?



Have more questions? Submit your question in the comment box below.


Mortgage Compliance Advisors offers a free webinar every month. Visit www.MortgageComplianceAdvisors.com to register for next month’s webinar or to learn more about how MCA can serve all your compliance needs.

(Mortgage Compliance Advisors, LLC (MCA) makes reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the answers. MCA makes no express or implied warranty of any kind respecting the information presented and assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. This online chat is not legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for proper professional or legal advice.)

2 Comments »
Jul
08
2010

Answers to Questions from our Webinar “Common Compliance Findings and How to Prevent Them”

We want to thank everyone who attended our webinar “Common Compliance Findings and How to Prevent Them.” As promised, below you will find answers to the questions asked during the webinar. You can also download the slides from the webinar.

We look forward to serving all your compliance needs. Feel free to contact us with any requests or questions. Click an icon under “Contact Us” at the top right.

Question 1 – If we purchased a QC manual from MCA, are updates available for new laws?

  • Answer - Yes, MCA does offer updates to your Quality Control Plan. You can contact us at your convenience so that we can discuss the specifics of your plan.

Question 2 – Do you have a suggestion on how much time before closing we should pull the FNMA comparison report?

  • Answer – If you are referring to the re-pulling of credit to check for undisclosed liabilities, we suggest you pull this as close to closing as possible.

Question 3 – What is an example of proof of receipt?

  • Answer – An example of proof of receipt would be a confirmation email, delivery receipt, fax confirmation, etc. (See slide 32)

Question 4 – How do you address a GFE issued as a lender and a subsequent submission as a broker?  One will have YSP and one will not, and investors fees are different.  Can you give guidance on this when we are submitting to 2 different avenues?

  • Answer – Once you provide the GFE, you cannot change the amount in block 1. This includes your investor fees. However, when you lock the loan, you will then be required to state the credit (YSP) to the borrower.

Question 5 – If the origination fee on the initial good faith estimate is less than the actual origination charge on the final HUD, is any corrective action required?

  • Answer – No corrective action is needed. However, some investors will require your most recently disclosed GFE figures match the final figures on your HUD1.

Question 6 – Are we required to provide evidence that the disclosures were provided to the borrowers within 3 days of the application date and/or the disclosures are required to be signed and dated within 3 days of the application date?

  • Answer – Yes, you are required to provide evidence you sent disclosures within three days of application. Borrowers are not required to sign the initial disclosures. However, some states do require their disclosures be signed.

Question 7 – Is redisclosure of TILA required if it increases .125%? We are interpreting if this increases or decreases.

  • Answer – TILA does state you need to redisclose if the APR increases or decreases by more than .125%

Question 8 – Do you have a list of what is considered “prepaid finance charge”? I am finding a great disparity of what is considered a PPF.

Question 9 – When a loan goes from a “float” to a lock and nothing else will change, is the GFE required to be redisclosed?

  • Answer – Yes, you will need to redisclose and update the important dates section on the GFE.

Question 10 – What is considered an early default, and if we do not service, how would we know?

  • Answer – Early Payment Default (EPD) is defined as 60 days late in the first 6 months by FHA and Fannie Mae defines EPD as 90 days past due in the past 24 months. For FHA, you can get this info in FHA Connection. For Fannie Mae you will need to be the servicer for this info.

Question 11 - How do you determine the application date while auditing to know that the initial disclosures were provided within 3 business days?

  • Answer – We generally use the earliest date located on the application. Generally the day the LO signed the application.

Question 12 – Must we issue a new TIL to customer within 3 days of discovering a change of interest rate or is it okay if mailed 6 days before closing?

  • Answer – A borrower must receive the new TIL 3 days prior to closing. If you mail the redisclosed TIL, you can close on the 7th day after mailing.

Question 13 – If you are a wholesale lender, does the 7 days start when you get the application or when the broker took the initial application?

  • Answer – According to TILA, a broker cannot issue a TIL (unless table funded). The 7 day waiting period does not start until the lender issues the initial TIL.

Question 14 – Does the 10 business days include Saturdays? I’ve heard yes and no.

  • Answer – Yes, you can count Saturday as a business day. (See slide 33)

Question 15 – What is a best practice correction, if a GFE does not have the important dates filled in correctly?  Is it okay to send a revised one to the borrower and put a processor cert explaining why in the file?

  • Answer – Yes. You are required to redisclose the GFE if there are changes to the important dates. Your Changed Circumstances form should state the reason for the change.

Question 16 – Do we need to include the TIL verbiage on all Truth in Lending disclosures? We have heard it is not required on the final TIL.

  • Answer – When reviewing the file for an audit, we follow the instructions per MDIA in that we look to see the verbiage has been included on the initial and any subsequent TIL disclosures, as well as the final TIL. What you are referring to is that some lenders are allowing the omission of the verbiage if the final TIL is within .125% tolerance of initial TIL. If the final is over the .125% tolerance, technically it is a re-disclosure of the TIL and is required to be provided to your borrower within 3 business days of closing. You will then have three disclosures, the first two which will be required to have the verbiage, and the Final, which your lender may not require the verbiage to be printed on.

Question 17 – What can I do to remedy findings in my QC audit report?

Answer – We suggest you review all the findings you receive in your Quality Control report. If you find that the issue was incorrect, copy the documents and attach them to your Quality Control report and make note of the corrections.

(Mortgage Compliance Advisors, LLC (MCA) makes reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the answers. MCA makes no express or implied warranty of any kind respecting the information presented and assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions. This online chat is not legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for proper professional or legal advice.)

No Comments »